Marquis for Schoeneweis? Where do Cubs sign up?
Back from Vegas no richer or poorer than when I left last Sunday. Almost didn’t make it until today, and in this age when the airlines take a well-deserved beating on a regular basis, here’s a doff of the chapeau to a United desk attendant in Vegas who got me on a direct flight home after my original flight to Denver was delayed and would have forced me to miss my connector home. “We’re going to find a way to get you home,” she said. Much appreciated.
The Cubs didn’t come home with Jake Peavy or a hitter, but they could be inching closer toward signing Milton Bradley to a free-agent contract. Bradley has been the Cubs’ No. 1 choice for some time, ahead of Raul Ibanez, who just signed a three-year, $30 mil deal with the Phillies, and Bobby Abreu, who made $16 million from the Yankees this year and is on the slow-moving free-agent market. Bradley is a switch hitter, who could afford the Cubs some flexibility. Abreu could be out there for a while if he’s seeking to make anywhere near what he made this year.
One rumor was that the Mets were interested in Jason Marquis for lefty reliever Scott Schoeneweis. In that case, where do the Cubs sign up? Schoeneweis, who pitched for the White Sox in 2003-04, has one more year left on his three-year, $10.8 million deal while Marquis has one year and $9.875 left on his three-year, $21 million deal, which as you can see, was, ahem, heavily back-loaded. Schoeneweis would make nice competition for Neal Cotts in the pen, and if the Cubs moved Marquis, that would leave a spot for Marshall, whom GM Jim Hendry praised to the hilt yesterday after he nixed the Peavy deal. Hendry certainly didn’t seem happy that Padres GM Kevin Towers kept throwing names of other teams’ players out to the media. Hendry put up with it for a chance to get Peavy, but it galled him nonetheless. Maybe that’s a lesson learned for “Tampering Towers,” as he’s called by some in the baseball industry. Towers really has no one to blame but himself for painting himself into such a corner.
Back to point, moving Marquis and at least most of his money is an essential for the Cubs, who must shed payroll before they can add. (The Peavy thing was an exception that would have forced Hendry to do some fancy footwork.)
Moving on, I see the Cubs tendering contracts to all their arb-eligible players by tonight’s deadline. Some of these players would make for nice trade bait, including infielder Ronny Cedeno and my old pal, reliever Michael Wuertz. Wuertz, who’s slider is as good as it gets when he’s on, will make under $1 million next year, making him attractive to somebody. “Wuertzy” is a real success story despite some tough times this year. You can’t help but pulling for a kid like that.
No, I don’t see the Cubs interested in Willy Taveras if the Astros, er, Rockies, non-tender him today. He bats right-handed, and his OBP this year was a sickly .308. Hendry loves Reed Johnson, whom the Cubs will tender a contract to and whose OBP was .358 this year.


They avoid arbitration with Chad Gaudin, ending speculation that they'd non-tender him. The Cubs reiterated to me today that all of the arb-eligible guys would be tendered contracts: Kevin Gregg, Reed Johnson, Michael Wuertz, Neal Cotts and Ronny Cedeno. There was no sense in non-tendering any of these guys. None makes all that much dough, and you might be able to trade one or two and get something.
All those guys contributed well at one point or another last year. Plus, the idea of having them neatly under contract for possible trade possibilities is an added bonus.
to Willy T. He can barely hit the ball out of the infield. If it wasn't for his speed and arm, he'd be selling Insurance somewhere.
How is Drayton spinning it to the public down in Houston? I loved reading those spin jobs in the Houston Chronicle. Always some reason to him being the cheap guy he is.
The only time they sell out that hell hole is:
1. When the Cubs are in town
or
2. When Clemens pitched.
It's been a couple of years since Willy T. was an Astro as he was shipped to CO.
As for Drayton, it's not so much him being cheap - he's actually spent quite a bit of late. It's the "always have to have choir boys" on the team that doesn't help them.
Agreed. When the Cubs are in town, it's 38-43K in attendance. Cubs leave and the next night it's back to 25-27K.
I think that was an idea Jon Heyman came up with in one of his blogs. He loves the idea of Marquis being a #5 for the Mets at around $5-6M. I think his rationale was that Marquis is considered some type of good luck charm for making the playoffs. If I recall, every team Jason has pitched for has made it to post-season.
Who's "everyone"? All the little voices in your head?
Last I checked there were no voices in my head.
Thanks for the summary Bruce. Do you see any angles on how the Cubs can acquire Chone Figgins (to play 2B and leadoff)? Everyone seems to think that acquiring Brian Roberts would be near impossible now, maybe something that can be re-visited at the trading deadline.
I bashed a guy for Chone, so I looked into it.
Figgins played in 116 games last year, had 72 runs, a couple of hrs, 22 rbis, 34 sbs, and a 367 OBP.
Not bad. Depends on who the Cubs would give up, and if the Angels would move him.
What position do you play Figgins??? Not 3rd, LF, SS, or 2nd base. What position does he solidify? Would Colorado ever trade Brad Hawpe?
Was of the mindset that they traded DeRosa.
Ideally, I would love to see them find a SS that can lead off. I am in the rare group that thinks Theriot is expendable. The guy has a rubber arm, and his stolen base percentage is close to 50%. That's a joke. Throw in that the league will take away that poke shot to right by sawing him off, and you get my drift. His value is high right now, and not sure if it gets any better. Why not maximize this now?
Like another guy wrote, if Fukudome stinks in spring training, they better send him to AAA. I don't think anyone I know has the patience to pray he can work it out. That would free up some room to move some guys around. He can't keep on getting a free pass. Contract or not. That is on Hendry, not on Piniella.
I don't know. It looks like the Cubs are very roster locked right now, and only RF is open. Which means more 1 pitch lead off at bats by #12, aka....captain ME. Where or when does Fontenot play? I don't think DeRosa should be pushed aside just because Fontenot was a good pinch hitter. I also don't believe you should rotate the two, so where will Fontenot play?
Steve,
I'm with you on trading Theriot. I wrote that to Bruce on his very first blog. Theriot is a perfect example of a guy over-achieving - sell him high while the league thinks he's an up and comer. I have also been on the trade DeRosa bandwagon. Different reason: his value is the highest of his career and he's coming into his walk year. Does anyone think Mark DeRosa is part of the Cubs future beyond 2009?